THE REGIMENT
Intelligence Fusion Terminal
MARKET HEALTH
SUPPLY AS OF --
Loading certification supply and award window...
Notice flow: what the federal market posted, and what we hold
Every contract notice posted government-wide in the trailing 365 days, counted from the full SAM.gov notice corpus (5,488,500 notices), set beside the rows we actually hold. This is the denominator the rest of the portal is measured against. It is the notice axis; the certification panel below it is the entity axis, and the two do not combine.
Loading notice flow...
Loading notice flow...
The gap is footprint, not a collection failure
The denominator is every federal notice of that type, across every industry the government buys in. Our collection is scoped to the NAICS codes on the active company profile, on purpose. So a coverage figure of 28 percent does not mean seventy-two percent went missing: it means the work we chase is roughly a quarter of what the government posts. The figure that would actually grade collection is coverage inside our own NAICS footprint, and it is not computable yet: the corpus carries a NAICS code on zero of its 5,488,500 rows. That is the enrichment pass, and until it lands this panel reads as footprint share.
Two denominators, never one
Solicitation-side notices and award notices are held in different tables and answer different questions: one is work you can still bid, the other is work already placed. A single coverage number spanning both would average a live-pipeline figure against a history figure and mean nothing. They are counted separately here and no combined rate is shown.
Participation and concentration by certification
One lane per certification. The headline is the share of firms holding that certification today that captured at least one award coded to that lane in the trailing window. Beneath it, the same lane measured by money: how much of the obligated dollars the largest awardees hold. Counts are always shown beside the rate.
Loading participation and concentration...
What the concentration numbers say
On a dollar-weighted basis, no lane here is dominated by a handful of firms. Every certification reads as unconcentrated, and by a wide margin: the most clustered lane on the page sits far below the threshold where a market is even called moderately concentrated. Whatever is limiting these certifications, it is not a few incumbents holding the money.
Participation and concentration answer different questions
Participation counts firms. Concentration counts money. A lane can have very few winners and still spread its dollars evenly among them, and a lane with many winners can still funnel most of its dollars to a short list. Read the two together and neither one alone: a low participation rate is a statement about how many certified firms are getting in, not a statement about whether the work is being captured by a clique.
Why there is no market total
No total row is shown, by design. A single firm can hold several of these certifications at once, so the lanes overlap. Adding them together would count the same firms more than once and produce a denominator that does not exist in the market.
Reading the 8(a) rate
8(a) is a nine-year fixed-term program. Firms that graduate leave the certified population, so they drop out of both the numerator and the denominator of the same window. The remaining cohort is, by construction, currently enrolled and actively developing business, which is why the 8(a) participation rate sits structurally far above the open-ended certifications. It is not evidence that 8(a) firms are better at capture, and the lanes should not be ranked against each other on this number alone.
How this is computed
Glass-box by default. If a number on this page cannot be traced to a count, it does not belong here.